It’s Time for Adults to Stop Bullying Kids and Each Other

 

by Larry Magid

We hear a lot about kids bullying* other kids and it is indeed a problem. But what about adults bullying other adults, or adults bullying kids?

True, bullying is a problem among youth. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that in 2009,  28% of 12 through 18 year old kids were “bullied by traditional means at school” while 6% were “bullied by electronic means anywhere.” There are of course other studies with other statistics, but just about all agree that it’s a problem that affects a significant minority — but not most — of tweens and teens.

But it’s also a problem for a signification percentage of adults and there are, sadly, cases of adults bullying children.

Adult-on-Adult Bullying

A 2010 study commissioned by the Workplace Bullying Institute and conducted by Zogby International found that more than a third (35%) “have experienced bullying firsthand.” Other surveys differ but it’s pretty clear that millions of adults have experienced verbal abuse, offensive conduct and sabotage of their work, according to the Institute.

There is also plenty of bullying within families and couples. According to the National Domestic Violence Hotline, a 2006 Harris poll, found that “approximately 33 million or 15% of all U.S. adults, admit that they were a victim of domestic violence.” Among all adults, 39% said they had experienced some type of abuse such as:

Military bullying

Bullying is also a problem in the military. Dr. Rene Robichaux, the Army’s Social Work program manager was quoted by Army News Service that “hazing often occurs in ‘elite’ military units, and that much of it is psychological and directed at newcomers.” That article also pointed out that “Bullies can also be found higher up in the ranks. Although leaders are supposed to look out for the welfare of their Soldiers, they are sometimes the ones who do the bullying.” The armed services are actively engaged in anti-bullying campaigns.

Police Harassment

Police harassment is often a form of bullying and it can be adult-to-adult or adult-to-child. In 2010, according to the Cato Institute’s National Police Misconduct Reporting Project, there were 3,814 unique reports of police misconduct involving 4,966 sworn law enforcement officers. Of these, 25% involved excessive force and 10.4% were sexual misconduct. It’s important to note that fewer than 1% of police officers (992 for each 100,000 officers) were involved in this misconduct. It’s anecdotal and it doesn’t always constitute bullying, but I’ve heard many reports of teens — including my own son — being harassed or teased by police officers.

Politicians & pundits too

And don’t forget the bullies you see on TV, whether they be politicians making derogatory comments about their opponents, pundits making mean or caustic comments, or adults bullying each other in sitcoms and other shows. I expect politicians to conduct vigorous campaigns but why can’t they agree not to lie or degrade their opponents. For good and bad, public figures are role models and some are modeling bad behavior.

Adults bullying children

Have you ever been out in public — say at a grocery store or restaurant — and seen an adult being abusive to a child? I’ve seen parents yell at kids for no apparent reason. I’ve seen parents swat kids and I’ve seen plenty of cases where parents and other adults were just rude to kids. I experienced it myself when I was in school. I had a gym teacher who regularly harassed and belittled me and other kids who he thought were too slow, too fat or too gay. If you don’t believe me, buy a copy of Warren’s Words: Smart Commentary on Social Justice. It was written by my elementary, middle school and high school friend and schoolmate Warren Blumenfeld, who documented some of this from his perspective as a gay teenager who — at the time — hadn’t yet come out.

In a paper, Teachers Who Bully Students: A Hidden Trauma, Stuart Twemlow and colleagues found that 70.4% of teachers asked said that they knew of “isolated cases” of teachers bullying students. 17.6% said it happened frequently and 40.2% admitted to having bullied a student at least once. In fairness, this was a very small study with only 116 responses from teachers from seven urban U.S. elementary schools. I wouldn’t generalize this data to apply to all teachers but even if the percentages turn out to be much lower, it’s still a cause for concern.

*Definition of bullying

There are lots of ways to define bullying and not all experts agree with this definition, but the closest one that we have to an “official” definition comes from the Olweus Bullying Prevent Program that defines bullying as “aggressive behavior that is intentional and that involves an imbalance of power. Most often, it is repeated over time.”

Nancy Willard, founder of EmbraceCivility.org, defines student bullying as ”hurtful act or acts that have caused severe distress, and are pervasive or persistent, and have caused physical harm to the student or his or her property, or significant interference with the students’ educational opportunities.”

Other experts define bullying slightly differently but one thing is for sure. Before we point our fingers and lecture young people about bullying, we need to look at our own behavior and those of our fellow grownups.

 

 

 

Posted in Child safety | Comments Off

It’s Time for Adults to Stop Bullying Kids and Each Other

This is a work in progress. Subject to editing and revision. Comments are welcome

by Larry Magid

We hear a lot about kids bullying* other kids and it is indeed a problem, but what about adults..

True, bullying is a problem among youth. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that in 2009,  28% of 12 through 18 year old kids were “bullied by traditional means at school” while 6% were “bullied by electronic means anywhere.” There are of course other studies with other statistics, but just about all agree that it’s a problem that affects a significant minority — but not most — tweens and teens.

But it’s also a problem for a signification percentage of adults and there are, sadly, cases of adults bullying children.

Adult on Adult Bullying

A 2010 study commissioned by the Workplace Bullying Institute and conducted by Zogby International found that more than a third (35%) “have experienced bullying firsthand.” Other surveys differ but it’s pretty clear that millions of adults have experienced verbal abuse, offensive conduct and sabotage of their work, according to the Institute.

There is also plenty of bullying within families and couples. According to the National Domestic Violence Hotline, a 2006 Harris poll, found that “approximately 33 million or 15% of all U.S. adults, admit that they were a victim of domestic violence.” Among all adults, 39% said they had experienced some type of abuse such as:

Military bullying

Bullying is also a problem in the military. Dr. Rene Robichaux, the Army’s Social Work program manager was quoted by Army News Service that “hazing often occurs in ‘elite’ military units, and that much of it is psychological and directed at newcomers.”  That article also pointed out that “Bullies can also be found higher up in the ranks. Although leaders are supposed to look out for the welfare of their Soldiers, they are sometimes the ones who do the bullying.” The armed services are actively engaged in anti-bullying campaigns.

Police Harassment

Police harassment is often a form of bullying and it can be adult to adult or adult to child. In 2010, according to the Cato Institute’s National Police Misconduct Reporting Project, there were 3,814 unique reports of police misconduct involving 4,966 sown law enforcement officers. Of these, 25% involved excessive force and 10.4% were sexual misconduct. It’s important to note that fewer than 1% of police officers (992 for each 100,000 officers) were involved in this misconduct. It’s anecdotal and it doesn’t always constitute bullying, but I’ve heard many reports of teens — including my own son — being harassed or teased by police officers.

Adults bullying children

Have you ever been out in public — say a grocery store or a restaurant — and seen an adult being abusive to a child.  I’ve seen parents yell at kids for no apparent reason. I’ve seen parents swat kids and I’ve seen plenty of cases were parents and other adults were just rude to kids. I experienced it myself when I was in school. I had a gym teacher who regularly harassed and belittled me and other kids who he thought we too slow, too fat or to gay. If you don’t believe me, buy a copy of Warren’s Words: Smart Commentary on Social Justice. It was written by my elementary, middle school and high school friend and schoolmate Warren Blumenfeld who documented some this from his perspective as gay teenager who – at the time — hadn’t yet come out.

In a paper, Teachers Who Bully Students: A Hidden Trauma, Stuart Twemlow and colleagues found that 70.4% of teachers asked said that they knew of “isolated cases” of students teachers bullying students. 17.6% said it happened frequently and 40.2% admitted to having bullied a student at least once. In fairness this was a very small study with only 116 responses from teachers from seven urban U.S. elementary schools. I wouldn’t generalize this data to apply to all teachers but even if the percentages turn out to be much lower, it’s still a cause for concern.

*Definition of bullying

There are lots of ways to define bullying and not all experts agree with this definition, but the closest one that we have to “official” definition comes from the Olweus Bullying Prevent Program that defines bullying as “aggressive behavior that is intentional and that involves an imbalance of power. Most often, it is repeated over time.”

 

 

Posted in Child safety | Comments Off

It’s Time for Adults to Stop Bullying Kids and Each Other

This is a work in progress. Subject to editing and revision. Comments are welcome

by Larry Magid

We hear a lot about kids bullying* other kids and it is indeed a problem, but what about adults..

True, bullying is a problem among youth. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that in 2009,  28% of 12 through 18 year old kids were “bullied by traditional means at school” while 6% were “bullied by electronic means anywhere.” There are of course other studies with other statistics, but just about all agree that it’s a problem that affects a significant minority — but not most — tweens and teens.

But it’s also a problem for a signification percentage of adults and there are, sadly, cases of adults bullying children.

Adult on Adult Bullying

A 2010 study commissioned by the Workplace Bullying Institute and conducted by Zogby International found that more than a third (35%) “have experienced bullying firsthand.” Other surveys differ but it’s pretty clear that millions of adults have experienced verbal abuse, offensive conduct and sabotage of their work, according to the Institute.

There is also plenty of bullying within families and couples. According to the National Domestic Violence Hotline, a 2006 Harris poll, found that “approximately 33 million or 15% of all U.S. adults, admit that they were a victim of domestic violence.” Among all adults, 39% said they had experienced some type of abuse such as:

Military bullying

Bullying is also a problem in the military. Dr. Rene Robichaux, the Army’s Social Work program manager was quoted by Army News Service that “hazing often occurs in ‘elite’ military units, and that much of it is psychological and directed at newcomers.”  That article also pointed out that “Bullies can also be found higher up in the ranks. Although leaders are supposed to look out for the welfare of their Soldiers, they are sometimes the ones who do the bullying.” The armed services are actively engaged in anti-bullying campaigns.

Police Harassment

Police harassment is often a form of bullying and it can be adult to adult or adult to child. In 2010, according to the Cato Institute’s National Police Misconduct Reporting Project, there were 3,814 unique reports of police misconduct involving 4,966 sown law enforcement officers. Of these, 25% involved excessive force and 10.4% were sexual misconduct. It’s important to note that fewer than 1% of police officers (992 for each 100,000 officers) were involved in this misconduct. It’s anecdotal and it doesn’t always constitute bullying, but I’ve heard many reports of teens — including my own son — being harassed or teased by police officers.

Adults bullying children

Have you ever been out in public — say a grocery store or a restaurant — and seen an adult being abusive to a child.  I’ve seen parents yell at kids for no apparent reason. I’ve seen parents swat kids and I’ve seen plenty of cases were parents and other adults were just rude to kids. I experienced it myself when I was in school. I had a gym teacher who regularly harassed and belittled me and other kids who he thought we too slow, too fat or to gay. If you don’t believe me, buy a copy of Warren’s Words: Smart Commentary on Social Justice. It was written by my elementary, middle school and high school friend and schoolmate Warren Blumenfeld who documented some this from his perspective as gay teenager who – at the time — hadn’t yet come out.

In a paper, Teachers Who Bully Students: A Hidden Trauma, Stuart Twemlow and colleagues found that 70.4% of teachers asked said that they knew of “isolated cases” of students teachers bullying students. 17.6% said it happened frequently and 40.2% admitted to having bullied a student at least once. In fairness this was a very small study with only 116 responses from teachers from seven urban U.S. elementary schools. I wouldn’t generalize this data to apply to all teachers but even if the percentages turn out to be much lower, it’s still a cause for concern.

*Definition of bullying

There are lots of ways to define bullying and not all experts agree with this definition, but the closest one that we have to “official” definition comes from the Olweus Bullying Prevent Program that defines bullying as “aggressive behavior that is intentional and that involves an imbalance of power. Most often, it is repeated over time.”

 

 

Posted in Child safety | Comments Off

Video Games and Societal Violence: Cause for Urgent Action or a Bridge Too Far?

By Michael Levine and Christopher Ferguson

In the wake of the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook, an unusual alliance of concerned policymakers from both sides of the aisle, as well as gun rights and children’s advocates have called for new studies of violent entertainment, presuming a link with societal violence. Senator Jay Rockefeller, the Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee and a highly regarded children’s champion, went so far as to assert: “Recent court decisions demonstrate that some people still do not get it. They believe that violent video games are no more dangerous to young minds than classic literature or Saturday morning cartoons. Parents, pediatricians, and psychologists know better.” In the President’s recent comprehensive plan to respond to the tragedy in Newtown, he earmarked funding for research on the role that violent media are playing in children’s healthy development.

As parents and as scholars involved in media research we are certainly concerned with violence in all of its forms, and the possibility that exposure could cause harm to children. But we are equally concerned that the recent public debate over video games, while completely understandable, could set a tone that will lead to conclusions that simply are not confirmed by the existing evidence. These charged conclusions could result in public policy decisions that are not only based on weak or non-existent evidence, but which will draw attention away from the search for the primary and preventable causes of American gun violence.

We know from history, that tragic events often spark moral panics that target media. Recall the tremendous hue and cry following Columbine, where the predators in the mass violence were portrayed as loners who were addicted to violent video games, or the recent descriptions of the Newtown gunman as someone who was isolated and played with digital media for hours a day.

But as appealing as the anecdotal evidence is, empirically these findings don’t hold up. Comprehensive, scientifically conducted reviews of the video game violence field such as those called for by some policymakers and advocates already exist: the U.S. Supreme Court as well as highly credible reviews by Australia and Sweden have all recently concluded that the existing video game research could not support direct links between violent entertainment and societal violence. (For a further report on the ways in which data are being debated see this recent review.)

In fact during the rise of video game use since Columbine, youth violence has plummeted to 40-year lows, and cross-nationally, countries that consume as many or more video games per capita have much lower violence rates, even if you factor out gun violence. As a cable news and social media saturated culture, we may be experiencing a kind of societal confirmation bias, paying attention only to shooters who fit our stereotypes, mainly young males, and ignoring media when shooters don’t fit our stereotypes such as the 62-year old man who killed two firefighters the week after Sandy Hook, the 70-year old man who attacked a Phoenix law office or the Georgia man in his 60s who initiated a stand-off after abducting a young boy.

The White House has used careful language in calling for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to conduct further study of gun violence and violent entertainment. Naturally, as scholars, we value the opportunity for research funding on an important topic. But, we need to be ever vigilant to de-couple the public outrage from the violence at Sandy Hook, from the conduct of deliberate and serious inquiry. The CDC’s track record in this area is in our view spotty. One of their studies found that once family, personality and social factors were controlled, violent video games and television no longer predicted youth aggression. Nonetheless, the authors of that study claimed media could be harmful, confounding their own important results. We worry that in a heated political environment, ideology could trump empirical evidence. One solution: data from any studies funded by the government should be made openly available for independent peer review by the scholarly community.

There are other ways to use research effectively: as a ballast and balance for industry and media designers. In the decade following Columbine the nation decided to invest its efforts in video game regulation. The result was two-fold—the development of a voluntary rating system that has been, as noted by the FTC highly effective, but which has some pluggable holes, especially in helping parents of the most vulnerable children make informed media consumption decisions and the creation of spurious legislation, often struck down by courts not only as unconstitutional but poorly supported by data. Tragically, in that time, we lost track of some of the much more vital causes of our epidemic of gun violence: namely, the lack of progress on mental health reform and common-sense measures like background checks on all gun purchases.

In brief, money spent chasing a moral panic over video games may be satisfying to those who worry about “a culture of violence,” but it has the possibility, unfortunately of causing a dangerous distraction from more important issues. Historical efforts to blame everything from comic books to Elvis Presley to Harry Potter for societal ills might sound right, but they are outside the realm of solid, scientific evidence. Much as we would like to believe there is some kind of magic elixir to bring communities together in action, efforts to blame video games and movies for the eruptions of violence we too often witness in the U.S. is certainly a “bridge too far.” We hope that policymakers, media industry leaders and parents themselves will remain focused on key solutions we know to be vitally important, based on the evidence, and starting right now.

This post also appeared in the Huffington Post.  Used by permission

Posted in Child safety, video games, violence. violent video games | Comments Off

Making it Safe to Compete for Child Athletes

by Larry Magid

The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children helps protect kids from abduction and exploitation

The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children helps protect kids from abduction and exploitation

I’ve been a board member at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) for several years and I’ve heard a lot of horrible stories about children who have been abducted or abused. Every story is tragic but the ones that turn my stomach the most are cases where trusted adults — be they teachers, clergy or even parents — abuse the very children they are supposed to be nurturing and protecting.  That was certainly the case when Penn State University assistant football coach, Jerry Sandusky, was convicted of multiple counts of sexual abuse against boys over a period of years. In addition to his duties at Penn State, Sandusky ran a summer football camp for youth.

Unfortunately, acts of child sexual exploitation are all to familiar to the staff of the NCMEC, a Congressionally authorized non-profit organization that works with law enforcement, families and other professionals on issues related to missing and sexually exploited children.

But it doesn’t have to be that way.  With better education, increased law enforcement and greater awareness its possible to better protect children in sporting programs, youth-serving organizations and everywhere else.

On March 19th and 20th, NCMEC is sponsoring a conference called Safe to Compete: Protecting Child Athletes from Sexual Abuse, where it will convene more than 50 youth-serving organizations, including the YMCA, Special Olympics, USA Swimming, USA Gymnastics,  and Big Brothers Big Sisters of America to talk about the issue of preventing abuse of children in sports programs.

Screen Shot 2013-03-13 at 11.06.58 PM

National Center for Missing & Exploited Children CEO John Ryan

In an interview (scroll down to listen to the podcast) NCMEC CEO John Ryan said “one of the deliverables of the summit will be to bring these leading national youth organizations to the Center and develop what we are calling sound practices so that parents can ask the right questions and that they can be assured that these organizations have the appropriate policies in place.” And when it comes to good practices, size doesn’t necessarily matter. “Some large organizations are not doing enough, some small organizations despite limited resources are doing more than one should expect. ”  He said that “there is no uniform code of behavior for youth serving organizations.”

Speakers at the conference will include Dr. Sharon W. Cooper, Developmental and Forensic Pediatrics, P.A., Sheldon Kennedy, Former NHL player and survivor of sexual abuse, Cal Ripken, Jr., founder of the Cal Ripken, Sr. Foundation and MLB Hall of Fame Inductee and John Walsh, NCMEC co-founder and host of “America’s Most Wanted.’

Click below to listen to or read my full interview with John Ryan, CEO of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Listen to podcast

Transcript of interview

Posted in Child safety | Comments Off

Survey: More Teens Accessing Internet via Smartphones

Smart phone use growing among teens (Source: Pew Internet Teens and Privacy Management Survey, July 26-September 30,  2012)

Smartphone use growing among teens (Source: Pew Internet Teens and Privacy Management Survey, July 26-September 30,
2012)

There was a time when I advised parents to put their computer in a central area of the home so they could keep their eye on their kids’ use. But increasingly kids are accessing the net on smartphones.

A Pew Internet & American Life survey found that one in four teens are “cell mostly” Internet users, accessing the net from their phones instead of from a computer. Nearly a quarter of teens (23%) have a tablet, which means that they can access the net from anywhere where there is a WiFi signal or almost anywhere if their tablet is equipped with a cellular modem.

The survey also found:

  • 78% of teens now have a cell phone, and almost half (47%) of them own smartphones. That translates into 37% of all teens who have smartphones, up from just 23% in 2011.
  • 95% of teens use the internet
  • 93% of teens have a computer or have access to one at home. Seven in ten (71%) teens with home computer access say the laptop or desktop they use most often is one they share with other family members
  • About three in four (74%) teens ages 12-17 say they access the internet on cell phones, tablets, and other mobile devices at least occasionally

The filter between their ears is the only one you can rely on

Back when kids were web surfing on computers only, it made sense for some families to put parental controls on their computers to keep their kids away from inappropriate sites or to monitor their activity. But now that they’re going mobile, it’s a bit more challenging. While there are ways parents can control or monitor mobile devices, it’s getting easier than even for kids to get around such restrictions which is why the old adage  “the best filter is the one that runs between the kids’ ears,” makes more sense now than when I first used it back in 1997.  That’s the filter that kids take with them wherever they go and with whatever device they use and while even great kids may sometimes do things that parents aren’t thrilled with, their best protection is to understand how to take care of themselves.

Conversation is the best protection

Also, teens are increasingly using apps rather than websites and it’s very difficult for parents to keep up with the growing number of available apps. So, more than ever, talk with your kids about safe and appropriate use of technology. Ask them what they’re doing and how they’re protecting their privacy and reputation.  Get them to teach you about the latest cool apps they’re using.  But word of warning — things change rapidly so be prepared to have this conversation over and over again if only so you can try to keep up.

For more on the survey and parenting in the digital age, see Teens’ tech getting very mobile: New study from my ConnectSafely.org co-director, Anne Collier.

Posted in apps, Child safety, pew | Tagged | Comments Off

World Day Against Cyber-Censorship Should Apply to Kids as Well

 

By Larry Magid

March 12th is World Day Against Cyber Censorship (source: Reporters Without Borders)

March 12th is World Day Against Cyber Censorship (source: Reporters Without Borders)

Reporters Without Borders has declared Tuesday, March 12th as World Day Against Cyber-Censorship in support of an “Internet without restrictions and accessible to all.”

The last time I checked, the word “all” applied to everyone — people of all ages. And the same is true for the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment, which makes no mention of age.

Yet, we live in a world where young people — especially those under 18 — are regularly denied access to unfettered access to speak or seek information on the Internet.

I’m not arguing that there should be no parental supervision. There are young people – especially very young children — who need to be protected from inappropriate content such as pornography but that shouldn’t be used as an excuse to ban young people from social media (as it is in many schools, even during free time) nor install software on the computers of teens that would block or monitor their activity.

Of course there are exceptions. Some young people exhibit high-risk behavior that justifies imposing restrictions or monitoring. But that’s true for some adults as well. In the U.S. and other countries there are procedures where people of any age can be denied some of their liberties after having been convicted of a crime or having been found to be mentally incompetent but, the assumption — at least in enlightened societies — is that people are able to make their own decisions and are given free access to speak and consume information unless a judge makes an exception after due process.

In the mean time, it’s worth reviewing Reporters Without Borders’ Enemies of the Internet list to learn how some countries — like Bahrain, Belarus, China, Cuba, Iran and North Korea have  imposed strong restrictions on citizen’s use of Internet technology and how others — including Australia Egypt, France, Russia and South Korea are “under surveillance  by the group for less stringent restrictions that nevertheless potentially restrict free access.

But when it comes to children, there are restrctions in every country – including the United States and Western Europe including those countries that have signed the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of the Child, that specifies (in aricle 13) that “The child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the child’s choice. It does go on to say that “the exercise of this right may be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary” which — as I read it — means that most kids should be given free access to information unless there are well thought out and well documented reasons to make an exception.

More:

Digital Citizenship Includes Rights as Well as Responsibilities (Larry Magid, Huffington Post)

Digital citizenship in process: Notes from the Baku IGF (Anne Collier, NetFamilyNews)

 

 

Posted in Child safety | Comments Off

Online Dating Safety Tips for Adults

 

These tips are for adults, not minorsMost online dating sites prohibit children and teens for good reasons.   Minors should not use these services, should not lie about their age and should not get together with people they meet online.  Tips are still a work in progress. Subject to change

  • For the first date, always meet in a public place like a busy restaurant or shopping mall.
  • Always tell friends where you’re going and who you’re meeting with. Plan to check in with a friend via phone or text message during the date so he or she knows all is well.
  • Don’t get into a car on your first date, go to the person’s home or invite them to your home — even if you’re having a good time. There is plenty of time for that later on.
  • See what you can learn about your date by “Googling” them or checking him or her out on Facebook.  You might want to become Facebook friends before you meet. You can always unfriend them.
  • Never send money to someone you’re interacting with online and never give out a credit card number, mother’s maiden name or other private information that could be used to access your financial accounts.
  • Stay sober during your first date to help make sure you’re exercising good judgement.
  • Be honest about your age and other characteristics and be very suspicious if you discover that your date wasn’t being honest.

More:

Valentine’s Day Dating Advice from Julie Spira

Julie Spira’s site CyberdatingExpert.com

Whatever Happened with Manti Te’o, Online Dating Scams Are Real

Online Dating Scams advice from OnguardOnline.gov

Posted in Child safety, cyberdating, online dating, safety tips | Comments Off

Student and school videos on “the good side of the Internet” could win $10K each

story

What’s Your Story video contest asks” What does the good side of the Internet look like?”

For the fourth year in a row, security company Trend Micro is sponsoring the “What’s Your Story” competition designed to encourage young people from the United States and Canada to submit videos that answer the question: “What does the good side of the Internet look like?” Videos should be short (between 30 seconds and two minutes) and can be produced using virtually any type of equipment, including cell phone cameras.

Contestants are encouraged to “tell us the good stuff you (and others) are doing … whether it’s connecting in kind ways, staying safe, keeping good reputations, doing cool things, being smart about cell phone cameras, or making a difference — for just one person or many.”

grandThere are two grand prizes and four runners-up. One individual filmmaker and one school or classroom that collaborates on a video each win $10,000. Two runner up individuals get $1,000 each and two schools get $1,000 each.

The contest is funded by security company Trend Micro (which helps support ConnectSafely.org, the nonprofit Internet Safety organization where I serve as co-director) and is co-sponsored by several companies and organizations, including Meetme, Tumblr, Family Online Safety Institute, 3BL Media and the Identity Theft Resource Center.

Judges select from a group of finalists and finalists are determined, in part, by ratings from the public based on online viewing before the judges’ meeting.

Lynette Owens – director of Trend Micro’s Internet Safety & Kids program

“It’s designed this way to encourage peer to peer messaging and it’s important these messages resonate with other young people,” said Lynette Owens, who coordinates the project for Trend Micro. Contestants are encouraged to promote, embed and link to their entries using Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Google (GOOG)+ other media “to showcase a positive use of social media,” said Owens.

Having judged previous contests, I can tell you that originality and creativity are more important than production values, though that counts, too. Material must be original and all elements — including background music — must respect others’ intellectual property rights and shouldn’t include any inaccurate information. We’ve disqualified some entries for quoting statistics that came from unreliable sources.

Entries, which must be submitted by April 16th, will be posted to the Web and can be viewed and ranked by the public until April 30th.  A summary of the contest rule are here.

This post is adapted from a column that appeared in the San Jose Mercury News

Posted in Child safety | Comments Off

Student and school videos on “the good side of the Internet” could win $10K each

story

What’s Your Story video contest asks” What does the good side of the Internet look like?”

For the fourth year in a row, security company Trend Micro is sponsoring the “What’s Your Story” competition designed to encourage young people from the United States and Canada to submit videos that answer the question: “What does the good side of the Internet look like?” Videos should be short (between 30 seconds and two minutes) and can be produced using virtually any type of equipment, including cell phone cameras.

Contestants are encouraged to “tell us the good stuff you (and others) are doing … whether it’s connecting in kind ways, staying safe, keeping good reputations, doing cool things, being smart about cell phone cameras, or making a difference — for just one person or many.”

grandThere are two grand prizes and four runners-up. One individual filmmaker and one school or classroom that collaborates on a video each win $10,000. Two runner up individuals get $1,000 each and two schools get $1,000 each.

The contest is funded by security company Trend Micro (which helps support ConnectSafely.org, the nonprofit Internet Safety organization where I serve as co-director) and is co-sponsored by several companies and organizations, including Meetme, Tumblr, Family Online Safety Institute, 3BL Media and the Identity Theft Resource Center.

Judges select from a group of finalists and finalists are determined, in part, by ratings from the public based on online viewing before the judges’ meeting.

Lynette Owens – director of Trend Micro’s Internet Safety & Kids program

“It’s designed this way to encourage peer to peer messaging and it’s important these messages resonate with other young people,” said Lynette Owens, who coordinates the project for Trend Micro. Contestants are encouraged to promote, embed and link to their entries using Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Google (GOOG)+ other media “to showcase a positive use of social media,” said Owens.

Having judged previous contests, I can tell you that originality and creativity are more important than production values, though that counts, too. Material must be original and all elements — including background music — must respect others’ intellectual property rights and shouldn’t include any inaccurate information. We’ve disqualified some entries for quoting statistics that came from unreliable sources.

Entries, which must be submitted by April 16th, will be posted to the Web and can be viewed and ranked by the public until April 30th.  A summary of the contest rule are here.

This post is adapted from a column that appeared in the San Jose Mercury News

Posted in Child safety | Comments Off